Psycholinguistic basis of the process of interference formation observed under Russian-Spanish language contact
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2022-3-6-13
Abstract
Aim. The purpose of this article is to determine the psycholinguistic basis of interference observed under Spanish-Russian language contact.
Methodology. The paper presents the study of the oral speech of Spanish-speaking Russians held with the help of the complex of different linguistic methods: survey, interview, linguistic experiment.
Results. In accordance with the results of the research various interference mistakes were revealed. An incorrect form of a link-verb as well as a redundant usage of a personal pronoun are presented as some key examples of interference in this paper.
Research implications. The research results contribute to the theory of language contact and can be applied in different psycholinguistic researches as well as in the process of psycholinguistic teaching.
Keywords
About the Author
O. A. Gnatyuk
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI); Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Gnatyuk – Senior Lecturer, Department of Foreign Languages; Postgraduate Student, Department of Language Theory and Anglistics
Leningradsky prospect 64, Moscow 125319
Very Voloshinoi ulitsa 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Zalevskaya A. A. Vvedeniye v teoriyu uchebnogo dvuyazychiya [Introduction to the theory of educational bilingualism]. Tver, Tver State University Publ., 2016. 269 p.
2. Leont'yev A. A. Osnovy psikholingvistiki [Fundamentals of psycholinguistics]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., Akademiya Publ., 2005. 288 p.
3. Iriskhanova K. M., ex. ed. Obshcheyevropeyskiye kompetentsii vladeniya inostrannym yazykom: izucheniye, obucheniye, otsenka (russkaya versiya) [Common European competencies of foreign language proficiency: study, training, assessment (Russian version)]. Moscow, Moscow State Linguistic University Publ., 2003. 212 p.
4. Khukhuni G. T., Valuytseva I. I. [Bilingualism or monolingualism? (Some aspects of the bilingualism and dyglossia in literary creativity)]. In: Polilingvial'nost' i transkul'turnyye praktiki [Polylinguality & Transcultural Practices], 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 196–203. DOI: 10.22363/2618-897X-2020-17-2-196-203.
5. Khukhuni G. T., Nelyubin L. L. Istoriya nauki o yazyke [The history of the science of language]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2016. 376 p.
6. Belda Torrijos M. Errors of the use of Spanish language: prepositions. In: Educaciόn y Futuro Digital, 2019, no. 18, pp. 43–62.
7. Ellis R. Second language acquisition. London, New York, Oxford University Press, 2008.148 p.
8. Harding-Esch E., Riley Ph. The bilingual family. A handbook for parents. UK, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 190 p.
9. Leow R. P., Zamora C. C. Intentional and Incidental L2 Learning. In: Loewen S., Sato M., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York, Routledge, 2017, pp. 33–49.
10. Scovel Th. Psycholinguistics. London, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009. 136 p.
Review
Views:
144
Email this article 
