Some modal verbs in enantiosemy syntax constructions in German
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2022-2-48-56
Abstract
Aim. To identify some models of enantiosemic syntactic constructions with modal verbs in the German language.
Methodology. The main content of the research is the analysis of enantiosemic syntactic constructions with modal verbs sollen and können. During the research, a descriptive method was used, based on observation and comparison, methods of the component analysis of structure and semantics of a sentence.
Results. In the course of the study, some syntactic models of sentences with enantiosemic meaning and conditions were revealed that contribute to the formation of their opposite meaning.
Research implications. The article summarizes new material on the topic under study, some schemes of enantiosemic syntactic structures with modal verbs are introduced into the academic use. The results of the research can find practical application in studying the issues of semantics, syntax and stylistics of the German language.
About the Author
O. P. Kolesnikova
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olesya P. Kolesnikova – Postgraduate student, Department of World Languages and Cultures, Don State Technical University; senior lecturer, Department of Scientific and technical translation and professional communication
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Averina A. V. [Dependence of the semantics of the German language modal verbs on contextual environment]. In: Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory & Practice], 2019, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 7–11. DOI:10.30853/filnauki.2019.2.1
2. Bondaruk Ye. V. [Modal verbs: between modality, evidentiality and temporality (on the material of modern German)]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 2019, no. 59, pp. 19–34. DOI:10.17223/19986645/59/2
3. Melikyan V. Yu. [The negopositive syntactic constructions with asymmetrical opposite meanings]. In: Aktual'nyye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki [Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics], 2017, no. 4 (28), pp. 126–135.
4. Merzlyakova N. P. [The problem of the modal verbs classification in modern German]. In: Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Filologicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Philological Sciences], 2007, no. 5 (2), pp. 123–130.
5. Ostrikova G. N. [On the expressiveness of anatiosemantic lexical phraseological units in German]. In: Gumanitarnyye i sotsial'nyye nauki (setevoye izdaniye) [Humanitarian and social sciences (online edition)], 2013, no. 4. URL: http://hses-online.ru/2013/04/10_02_19/18.pdf (accessed: 07.08.2019).
6. Ostrikova G. N., Kolesnikova O. P. [Expression of emotionality and expressivity in enantiosemy sentences in German]. In: Gumanitarnyye i sotsial'nyye nauki (setevoye izdaniye) [Humanitarian and social sciences (online edition)], 2020, no. 2. URL: http://hses-online.ru/2020/02/25.pdf (accessed: 07.08.2019). DOI:10.18522/2070-1403-2020-79-2-215-223
7. Ostrikova G. N., Kolesnikova O. P. [On some interrogative sentences with enantiosemic meaning in the German language]. In: Problemy issledovaniya i prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov v polikul'turnom prostranstve: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Krasnodar, 16–17 maya 2019g.) [Problems of research and teaching of foreign languages in a multicultural space : materials of the international scientific and practical conference, Krasnodar, May 16–17, 2019]. Krasnodar, Kuban State University Publ., 2019, pp. 89–92.
8. Rogozhnikova I. N. [Communicative-pragmatic space of directive speech acts with modal verbs (in the German language)]. In: Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznaniye [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 2012, no. 2 (16), pp. 85–89.
9. Shakirova R. D. [Contextual and semantic features of modal verbs müssen, mögen, können, dürfen functioning in epistemic role]. In: Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bashkir University], 2012, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 113–116.
10. Shendels Ye. I. [Denial as a linguistic concept (on the material of the German language)]. In: Uchenyye zapiski MGPIIYA im. M. Toreza [Scientific Notes of the The Maurice Thorez Institute of Foreign Languages], 1959, vol. XIX, pp. 104–110.
11. Jung W. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Leipzig, Bibliographisches Institut, 1980. 488 s.
Review
Views:
79
Email this article 
