Politeness in university student – teacher email communication: a Croatian teachers' perspective
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-5-48-58
Abstract
Aim. The aim of the article is to get an initial insight into how Croatian university teachers perceive their students’ e-mails in terms of politeness.
Methodology. The given study incorporates a small-scale qualitative and quantitative analysis of data collected via a meticulously designed questionnaire, administered to a group of Croatian university teachers focused on their perception of their students’ emails.
Results. The study found that although Croatian teachers express general satisfaction with students' etiquette, they note problems that indicate insufficient development of students' communicative competence. This is due to students' lack of knowledge of politeness strategies and their lack of awareness of social distance and power distance. Thus, the author emphasizes the need for teaching electronic etiquette in the Croatian higher education system and proposes to introduce a special course on electronic communication etiquette into educational programs.
Research implications. Although the study is based on a rather limited amount of material, it provides an initial understanding of the problems that arise in the e-mail correspondence of students and teachers at Croatian universities and motivates for further research, justifying the introduction of comprehensive education in the field of netiquette at the university level. The importance of understanding the meaning of polite communication and mastering politeness strategies for the development of socio-cultural communicative competence, especially in the academic context, is emphasized, as well as the need for further research into the texts of Croatian students' e-mails in order to identify problems and formulate appropriate recommendations for their solution.
About the Author
K. KolarRussian Federation
Klara Kolar – Postgraduate Student, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Philology
ulitsa Miklukho-Maklaya 6, Moscow 117198
References
1. Alemi, M. & Maleknia, Z. (2023). Politeness markers in emails of non-native English speaking university students. In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, 27 (1), 67–87. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-33334.
2. Eslami Zohreh, R. & Wei-Hong, K. (2015). Facework in Non-Face-Threatening Emails by Native and Non-Native English Speakers. In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, 4, 111–126.
3. Nguyen, M. H., Gruber, J., Fuchs, J., Marler, W., Hunsaker, A. & Hargittai, E. (2020). Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research. In: Social Media + Society, 6 (3). URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305120948255 (accessed: 10.01.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948255.
4. Wallengren Lynch, M., Dominelli, L. & Cuadra, C. (2022). Information Communication Technology during Covid-19. In: Social Work Education, 42 (1), 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2022.2040977.
5. Codina-Espurz, V. (2021). The influence of social distance and power in email politeness in an academic context. In: Estudios Interlingüísticos, 9, 44–59.
6. Almoaily, M. (2018). Greetings as a politeness strategy in EFL distance learning students' official emails.In: Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6 (6), 259–266. DOI: 10.13189/lls.2018.060601.
7. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. In: Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (13), 3193–3215. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006.
8. Kochkareva, I. V. (2021). Acquaintance with Digital Etiquette: Email Correspondence for Distance Learning. In: Development of education, 4 (1), 47–50. DOI: 10.31483/r-97473 (in Russ.).
9. Salazar Campillo, P. (2018). Student-initiated email communication: An analysis of openings and closings by Spanish EFL learners. In: Sintagma: revista de lingüística, 30, 81–93. DOI: 10.21001/sintagma.2018.30.05.
10. Zbenovich, C., Larina, T. V. & Ozyumenko, V. (2023). Culture and identity in critical remarks: A case study of Russian and Israeli academic classroom discourse. In: Pragmatics and Society, 15 (3), 351–375. DOI: 10.1075/ps.20064.zbe.
11. Zhou, Q., Laiche, S. & Larina, T. V. (2023). Emotional effect of teachers’ discourse in a multicultural classroom. In: Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 22 (1), 123–137. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.1.10.
12. Larina, T. (2015). Culture-specific communicative styles as a framework for interpreting linguistic and cultural idiosyncrasies. In: International Review of Pragmatics, 7 (2), 195–215. DOI: 10.1163/18773109-00702003.
13. Kolar, K. (2022). Politeness Strategies in Croatian University Student-Teacher Email Communication. In: Word, utterance, text in cognitive, pragmatic and cultural aspects: Proceedings of the XI International Scientific Conference (Chelyabinsk, April 7–9, 2022): in 2 parts. Part 2. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University publ., pp. 72–76. DOI: 10.47475/9785727118054_72.
14. Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Locher, M. & Larina, T. V. (2019). Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts. In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23 (4), 873–903. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-873-903.
16. Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Leech, G. & Larina, T. (2104). Politeness: West and East. In: Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series Linguistics (Russian Journal of Linguistics), 4, 9–34.
18. Locher, M. A. & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. In: Journal of Politeness Research, 1 (1), 9–33. DOI: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.
19. Eslami, Z., Larina, T. V. & Pashmforoosh, R. (2023). Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, 27 (1), 7–38. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-34051.
20. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.