Preview

Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics

Advanced search

Metaphorical means utilized to express pride in Russian and Chinese languages

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-4-89-96

Abstract

Aim. To analyze, study and categorize metaphorical strategies used to convey heightened self-esteem (pride) in Russian and Chinese languages. It aims to identify shared traits and nuanced distinctions in linguistic techniques for expressing this intricate aspect of human emotion.
Methodology. In the course of the research, various types of linguistic analysis were used on the basis of a corpus-oriented approach: analysis of dictionary definitions, contextual analysis, elements of component analysis, comparative analysis, morphemic analysis. General scientific methods were also used: descriptive method, classification method.
Results. The metaphorical images of ‘pride’ present in various languages have both common and national-cultural features. Common to Russian and Chinese languages are orientation-type metaphors (up); ontological (human, gas, fire, light) and structural (disease). In Chinese, ‘pride’ can be associated with the national cultural metaphors of “half a bottle of liquid” and “a rotting plant”.
Research implications. The article is about the systematization of means expressing the meaning of pride, which can contribute to the ideographic description of this fragment of the mental-emotional sphere of person; identification of possible discrepancies with the means of different languages, and establishment of national and cultural components in the designation of the concept of pride.

About the Author

Wenxin Yu
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Yu Wenxin – Postgraduate Student, Department of comparative analysis of languages

Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991



References

1. Apresian, Ju. D. (1995). The image of man: An experiment in systemic description based on linguistic data. In: Topics in the Study of Language, 1, 37–67 (In Russ.).

2. Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Theory of metaphor. Moscow: Progress publ. (In Russ.).

3. Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Language and the world of man. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury publ. (In Russ.)

4. Vezhbitskaya, A. (1996). Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow: Russkiye slovari publ. (In Russ.).

5. Shakhovsky, V. I. (2019). Linguistic theory оf emotions and its foundations. In: Journal of Psycholinguistics, 1 (39), 22–37. DOI: 10.30982/2077-5911-2019-39-1-22-37 (In Russ.).

6. Karasik, V. I. (2018). Linguistic conceptualization of pride in Russian and English cultures. In: RUDN Journal of Russian and Foreign Languages Research and Teaching, 16 (2), 157–171. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2264-2018-16-2-157-171 (in Russ.).

7. Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

8. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2004). Metaphors We Live By. Moscow: Editorial URSS publ. (In Russ.).

10. Bogdanova, L. I. (2023). Man in the reflection of the zoomorphic metaphor. In: Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal, 2, 24–40. DOI: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-2023-2-01-02 (In Russ.).

11. Miloslavskiy, I. G. (2017). “Target” as a characteristic of the linguistic research. In: Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal, 1, 9–23 (In Russ.).


Review

Views: 95


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5059 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5075 (Online)