Functionality and linguocreative potential of English neologisms (the study of words related to the sphere of non-political social relations)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-2-52-63
Abstract
Aim. To describe functional characteristics of neologisms in the English language and model cognitive mechanisms of their use in speech and actual meaning perception.
Methodology. The paper presents the case study of lexical units related to the sphere of non-political social relations, defined by established lexicographic online resources as neologisms of the English language (48 units, referring to the period from January 2022 to July 2023). Morpheme-word-building, structural-semantic and contextual analyses were used as research methods. These methods were supplemented by the method of cognitive modeling, which allows establishing the direction of verbal-associative processing of the meanings of neologisms in the statement.
Results. The selected neologisms are described in terms of (1) their subject-thematic novelty; (2) systemic and empirical productivity, that is, the modes of word formation preferred by language users within the framework of the new-words formation possibilities provided by the English language system. The process of neologization is described as a form of linguo-creative thinking of language users, who rely on semantic flexibility, figurative adaptability and ability to transform the associative potential of conventional language units in the communicative situations which require exchange of new knowledge about the surrounding reality.
Research implications. The results of the study contribute to neology, expanding our understanding of the functional properties of neologisms in the English language. The study continues the anthropocentric direction in the analysis of neologisms, focusing on the description of the communicative and cognitive activity of Homo Loquens, who uses such units in speech.
About the Author
T. V. UstinovaRussian Federation
Tatiana V. Ustinova – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Department of Linguistics, Translation and Intercultural Communication
Leninskie gori 1, Moscow 119991
References
1. Senko, E. V. (2007). Neologization in the modern Russian language: cross-level aspect. Saint Petersburg: Nauka publ. (in Russ.).
2. Mattiello, E. (2017). Analogy in Word-Formation. A Study of English Neologisms and Occasionalisms. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
3. Kerremans, D. (2015). A Web of New Words. A Corpus-Based Study of the Conventionalization Process of English Neologisms. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
4. Severskaya, O. I. (2020). Covidiots on coronacation: coronaviral lexicon as a diagnostic field for actual discoursive practices. In: Communication Studies, 7 (4), 887–906. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2020.7(4).887-906 (in Russ.).
5. Sternin, I. A. & Rudakova, A. V. (2011). Psycholinguistic meaning of the word and its description. Staarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing (in Russ.).
6. Belkova, A. E. (2018). Functioning of neologisms in Internet resources: based on the material of the
7. NoNaMe website. Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevartovsk State University Publ. (in Russ.).
8. Gridina, T. A. (1996). Language game: stereotype and creativity. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University Publishing House (in Russ.).
9. Ustinova, T. V. (2021). Multifunctionality of linguistic creativity in speech-thinking activity. In: Ural Journal of Philology. Series: Language. System. Personality: Linguistics of creativity, 2, 66–77. DOI: 10.26170/23067462_2021_02_06 (in Russ.).
10. Wu, C.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Chen, P.-Z. & Chen, H.-C. (2020). A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test from 2000 to 2019. In: Frontiers in Psychology, 11, article 573432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432.
11. Munat, J. (2016). Lexical Creativity. In: Jones, R. H. (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity. London; New York: Routledge. pp. 92–106.
12. Kubryakova, E. S. (2004). Language and knowledge: on the way to obtaining knowledge about language. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury publ. (in Russ.).
13. Evans, V. (2019). Cognitive Linguistics: A Complete Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14. Geeraerts, D. (2021). Cognitive Semantics. In: Wen, X. & Taylor, J. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York; London: Routledge. pp. 19–29.
15. Baranov, A. N. & Dobrovolsky, D. O. (2008). Aspects of the theory of phraseology. Moscow: Znak publ. (in Russ.)
16.