Paradigmatic relations in the lexical-semantic group “Smell”
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-5-81-94
Abstract
Aim. To characterize the system of language verbalization of smell as a means of objectification of the olfactory code of Russian culture.
Methodology. The combination of cognitive and linguistic-cultural approaches to the work involves studying the relationship between language and consciousness, language and culture, which is achieved by a number of methods. Etymological analysis reveals the original meaning of the lexical units being studied; the method of dictionary entries analysis and the method of their generalization show the main features of meanings. Contextual analysis and compatibility analysis complement the semantic structure of the lexical units verbalizing smell, and statistical analysis shows the frequency of their usage and the digital relationship between them. Using the method of linguistic-cognitive modeling, the obtained data is structured and the system of linguistic verbalization of smell in Russian linguistic culture is described.
Results. The analysis of nouns of the lexical-semantic group “smell” made it possible to reveal the inner form of words and its influence on the signs that are actualized in modern Russian. The obtained data made it possible to characterize the paradigmatic relations between the lexical units that make up the group, as well as to present them in the form of a model.
Research implications. The theoretical and practical significance of the article is determined by the necessity to develop a model for the analysis of perceptual vocabulary. A systematic presentation of a fragment of the olfactory cultural code can be used in the practice of lexicographic description of vocabulary. The presented model can be applied to characterize other modes of perception.
About the Author
T. Yu. PeredrienkoRussian Federation
Tatiana Yu. Peredrienko – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Department of Foreign Languages
prospekt V. I. Lenina 76, Chelyabinsk 454080
References
1. Basalaeva, Ye. G. (2013). Language representation of odour in the internet perfume discourse. In: Tomsk State University Journal, 375, 16–20 (in Russ.).
2. Trofimova, N. A. & Mamtseva, V. V. (2020). Love and smells: representation of olfactory quality in love discourse (based on the German language). St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Economics publ. (in Russ.).
3. Letyagina, S. K. (2013). Gender Pecularities of Olfactory self-Presentation of a Personality in social Interaction. In: Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2 (2), 163–166 (in Russ.).
4. Shishova, E. S. (2020). New Residential Districts Ordering: from Language of Smells Description to the Space Sensory Order. In: Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 12 (3), 10–30. DOI: 10.19181/inter.2020.12.3.1 (in Russ.).
5. Pavlova, N. S. (2006). Vocabulary with the seme “smell” in language, speech and text [dissertation]. Yekaterinburg (in Russ.).
6. Alakhverdieva, L. G. (2018). Smell vocabulary as a social marker in the novel Bel ami by Guy de Maupassant. In: Herald of Dagestan Staste University. Series 2: Humanities, 3 (2), 90–98. DOI: 10.21779/2542-0313-2018-33-2-90-98 (in Russ.).
7. Chuksina, S. I. (2014). Functioning of verbs of olfactory perception in work of S. N. Sergeyev-Tsensky. In: Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 4 (132), 111–116 (in Russ.).
8. Papchenko, E. V. (2008). The problem of scent systematization. In: The Humanities and socio-economic sciences, 5 (42), 98–101 (in Russ.).
9. Bryleva, R. F. (2019). Comparative analysis of olfactory substantives with positive evaluative component in Russian, French and Bashkir languages. In: Bulletin of the Bashkir University, 24 (3), 694–699. DOI: 10.33184/bulletin-bsu-2019.3.26 (in Russ.).
10. Kostyaev, A. I. (2020). Aromas and smells in the history of culture: signs and symbols. Moscow: Stereotip publ. (in Russ.).
11. Shnyakina, N. Yu. (2020). Olfactory signs as objects of verbalization. In: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University Bulletin, 52, 93–111. DOI: 10.47388/2072-3490/lunn2020-52-4-93-111 (in Russ.).
12. Belskaya, T. I. (2009). The means of representation of the concept “smell” in French culture. In: Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 566, 46–61 (in Russ.).
13. Dekhanova, O. A. (2020). The reflection of xix century olfactory culture in the works of F. M. Dostoevsky. The smell of the city on the example of the novel Crime and Punishment. In: Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal, 3 (11), 68–90. DOI: 10.22455/2619-0311-2020-3-68-90 (in Russ.).
14. Lebedeva, M. S. & Ezhova, E. N. (2021). Ways to actualization the modus of smell in advertising texts. In: PR and advertising in a changing world: regional aspect, 25, 69–77.
15. Fedorova, I. A., Ilina, U. N. & Grebenkina, E. K. (2022). Interlanguage equivalents in the semantic field “smell” in romance languages. In: Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series “Humanities”, 9-2, 118–122. DOI: 10.37882/2223-2982.2022.09-2.23 (in Russ.).
16. Klassen, K., Howes, D. & Sinnott, E. (2010). The meaning and power of smell. In: Weinstein, O. B., comp. Aromas and smells in culture: in 2 books. Book 1. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye publ. pp. 43–51.
17. Leontyeva, E. Yu. (2021). Big city center: smell, human dimension, chronotope. In: Sociology of City, 4, 52–60.
18. Belozyorova, A. A. & Ovsienko, T. V. (2020). Pragmalinguistic representation of the olfactory image: gender aspect (based on German-language fiction). In: World of Science. Series: Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies (online), 2 (11). URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/25FLSK220.pdf (accessed: 04.02.2024). DOI: 10.15862/25FLSK220.
19. Rindisbacher, H. J. (2010). From Smell to Word: Modeling Meanings in Patrick Süskind's Novel Perfume. In: Weinstein, O. B., comp. Aromas and smells in culture: in 2 books. Book 2. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye publ. pp. 579–608.