The Conceptual Component of the Linguocultural Type “Teacher” in Chinese
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-1-52-64
Abstract
Aim. To identify the conceptual component of the linguocultural type “teacher” in the Chinese language.
Methodology. The research material was the data of explanatory, etymological, encyclopedic, phraseological, frequency dictionaries, as well as a dictionary of synonyms and media texts placed in the Chinese language corpora. In the course of the research, such methods as etymological analysis, semantic analysis, contextual-descriptive analysis, cognitive-discursive analysis and comparative analysis of the vocabulary use were applied.
Results. The article presents the cultural specifics of the naming process reflected in the Chinese language picture of the world, as well as the semantic evolution of the hieroglyphics denoting the inguocultural type “teacher”. The conceptual component of this type in the Chinese language is established.
Research implications. The theoretical and practical significance of this study lie in the fact that it complements the comparative studies of the linguocultural type “teacher” in the Chinese and Russian language picture of the world.
About the Author
L. Ma
Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Liya Ma – Postgraduate Student, Department of English
prospekt imeni V. I. Lenina 27, Volgograd 400005
References
1. Dmitrieva O. A. Lingvokulturnyye tipazhi Rossii i Frantsii XIX veka [Linguocultural types of Russia and France of the 19th century]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2007. 307 p.
2. Dmitrieva O. A. [The model personality in a foreshortening of the theory of linguocultural types]. In: Aktualnyye problemy germanistiki, romanistiki i rusistiki [Actual problems of German studies, novelistic studies and Russian studies], 2013, no. 1, pp. 197–203.
3. Dmitrieva O. A., Murzinova I. A. Teoriya lingvokulturnykh tipazhey [Theory of linguocultural types]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel'skiye resheniya Publ., 2018. 136 p.
4. Karasik V. I., Dmitriyeva O. A. [Linguocultural type: to the definition of the concept]. In: Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: lingvokul'turnyye tipazhi [Axiological linguistics: linguocultural types]. Volgograd, Paradigma Publ., 2005, pp. 5–25.
5. Bkhatti N. V., Zakharova M. Yu., Savchenko E. P., Kharitonova E. Yu. Lingvokulturnyye tipazhi obrazovatel'noy sfery angliyskoy i russkoy lingvokul'tur [Linguocultural types of the educational sphere of English and Russian linguistic cultures] Moscow, Ed. Office of Moscow Region State University, 2019. 88 p.
6. Murzinova I. A. [The criteria of the classification of linguocultural personality types]. In: Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 2021, no. 6 (159), pp. 114–117.
7. Sergeyeva E. N. [The notion of concept and aspects of its studies in modern linguistics]. In: Vestnik VEGU [Vestnik VEGU], 2009, no. 3 (41), pp. 72–85.
8. Solomatina M. N. [More than a teacher: peculiarities of language representation of concept “teacher” in Chinese linguoculture]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics], 2020, no. 2, pp. 92– 99. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2020-2-92-99.
9. Ter-Minasova S. G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Language and intercultural communication]. Moscow, SLOVO Publ., 2000. 259 p.
10. 程裕祯. 中国文化要略. 4版. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017. 462页.
11. 韩昌黎全集. (唐)韩愈著. 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 1996. 1046页.
12. 三字经. 李凯, 干璐娜编注. 上海: 上海财经大学出版社, 2018. 287页.
13. 史记. 胡怀琛, 庄适, 叶绍钧选注; 马乾, 周艳红校订. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2018. 396页.
14. 文白对照十三经(上册). 许嘉璐主编. 广州: 广东教育出版社, 1995. 1047页.
15. 文白对照十三经(下册). 许嘉璐主编. 广州: 广东教育出版社, 1995. 1090页.
16. 荀子. 方达评注. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016. 555页.
17. 扬子法言. (汉)扬雄著; (晋)李轨, (唐)柳宗元注. 北京: 中国书店, 2018. 325页.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
116
Email this article 
