Preview

Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics

Advanced search

Mediated dialogue from the point of view of fuctional linguistics

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2022-3-2-72-79

Abstract

Aim is to consider the interaction of professional diplomats mediated by the electronic media from the point of view of functional linguistics by means of conversational analysis.

Methodology. The analysis of random sample of speeches the official representative of the US White House, J. Psaki and the reactions to them of the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, M.V. Zakharova, by the methods of functional linguistics and modified conversational analysis, was carried out.

Results. It is proved that the conversational analysis of the foreign policy dialogue within the framework of functional linguistics deepened the understanding of the use of various linguistic practices, defined the conversation in interaction as a dynamic process with the possibility of violating the hicet hoc conversation rule and switching stylistic codes. In contrast to discourse-oriented analysis, the approach of conversational analysis to the corpus of "dialogues" (statements – comments to them) tends to focus on the examples that share not only the form, but also the type of action. However, the model of the "dialogue" mediated by the electronic media allows communication by polycode means, including the iconic ones, with some temporary delay. The dynamics of the context development, the meaning of the transmitted replicas, including the implicit, extralinguistic details of interaction, the sequence of replicas-reactions, i.e. the basic characteristics of the communicative aspect of functional linguistics, remain the most important for the mediated dialogue.

Research implications. Theoretical significance consists in confirming and expanding knowledge in the field of functional linguistics to the sphere of foreign policy communication mediated by the electronic media. The principle of displaced agonality is proposed as one of the options for correspondence communication in foreign policy discourse.

About the Authors

O. I. Maksimenko
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation

Olga I. Maksimenko – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Department of Theory of Language, English and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Linguistics

ulitsa Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region



M. V. Belyakov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Michail V. Belyakov – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Deputy Head, Department of the Russian Language

prospekt Vernadskogo76, Moscow 119454



References

1. Belyakov M. V., Maksimenko O. I. [Echo-phrases of foreign policy discourse]. In: Voyenno-gumanitarnyy al'manakh. Seriya «Lingvistika». Vyp. 6. Yazyk. Kommunikatsiya. Perevod: materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii po aktual'nym problemam teorii yazyka i kommunikatsii [Military humanitarian almanac. Series “Linguistics”. Issue. Language. Communication. Translation: Proceedings of the XV International Scientific Conference on Actual Problems of the Theory of Language and Communication]. Moscow, Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Publ., 2021, pp. 127–137.

2. Demina M. A. [The phonetic component of conversation analysis]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanitarian Sciences], 2019, no. 5 (821), pp.35–46.

3. Isupova O. G. [Conversion Analysis: Presentation of the Method]. In: Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoye modelirovaniye (sotsiologiya: 4M) [Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)], 2002, no. 5, pp. 33–52.

4. Korbut A. M. [Turn-talking: non-technical introduction to conversation analysis]. In: Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye [Russian Sociological Review], 2015, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 120–141.

5. Ulanovskiy A. M. [Phenomenology of conversation: method of conversation analysis]. In: Voprosy psikholingvistiki [Journal of Psycholinguistics], 2016, no. 27, pp. 218–237.

6. Sheygal Ye. I., Deshevova V. V. [Agonality in communication: the structure of the concept]. In: Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 2009, no. 34 (171), pp. 145–148.

7. Goodwin C., Heritage J. Conversation analysis. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, 1990, vol. 19, pp. 283–307. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435.

8. Kasper G., Wagner J. Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. In: Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2014, vol. 34, pp. 171–212. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190514000014.

9. Schegloff E. A. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In: Language in society, 2000, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 1–63. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500001019.

10. Schegloff E. A. Sequence organization in interaction. Vol. I. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007. 318 p.

11. Sidnell J., Stivers T., eds. The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 2012. 848 p.


Review

Views: 236


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5059 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5075 (Online)