Proper names as an integral part of a term in technical terminology (based on the terminology of measuring instruments)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2025-5-110-120
Abstract
Aim is to investigate the mechanisms of formation and peculiarities of functioning of term-eponyms in the names of measuring instruments, and to analyse their role in professional communication and scientific and technical discourse.
Methodology. Using a continuous sampling method from the international electrical engineering dictionary, terms were selected that are the names of devices that contain a proper name. In the course of the research, the following methods were used: comparative method, lexicographic and etymological analysis.
Results. The study identified the main models of formation of eponymic terms in the names of measuring instruments were identified, their high degree of terminology was proved, a stable connection between the eponymic part of the term and the measured value was established, confirming the importance of this terminology for the standardisation of professional communication.
Research implications. The results of the study have practical value for terminology, lexicography and translation theory, and highlight the need to create specialised dictionaries of term-eponyms.
About the Author
M. Yu. Rogova
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Margarita Yu. Rogova – Lecturer, Department of English for Instrument-Making Specialties
Moscow
References
1. Lavrent'eva, E. A. (2018). Consubstantionality as one of the basic elements of general linguistic culture development. In: Philology. Theory & Practice, 1-1 (79), 131–134. DOI: 10.30853/filnauki.2018-1-1.34 (in Russ.).
2. Nikolaeva, N. S. (2021). The phenomenon of consubstantiality in terminology (on the basis of the “welding” terminology). In: International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 1-2 (52), 15–19. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2021-1072 (in Russ.).
3. Khakieva, Z. U. & Zekieva, P. M. (2021). Semantic processes of term derivation. In: Innovative aspects of the development of science and technology: materials of the X International scientific and practical conference (Saratov, June 23, 2021). Moscow: “KDU” publ., “Dobrosvet” publ., pp. 230–238 (in Russ.).
4. Kukasova, D. G. & Suleymanova, А. К. (2018). Processes of terminologization of the lexicon of the literary language (with reference to terms of oil and gas geology). In: The world of science, culture and education, 4 (71), 453–455 (in Russ.).
5. Sorokina, E. A. (2024). On some problematic issues of modern terminology. In: Cognitive studies of language, 4 (60), 84–89 (in Russ.).
6. Zyablova, O. A. (2005). Principles of language research for special purposes [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).
7. Zianko, M. I. (2023). Consubstantiality of English-Language Branding Terms. In: Philology. Theory & Practice, 16 (1), 276–284. DOI: 10.30853/phil20220733 (in Russ.).
8. Rulevskaya, E. S. (2021). Problems of onomastic vocabulary terminologization processes. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 4, 95–104. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2021-4-95-104 (in Russ.).
9. Gorokhova, N. & Kubyshko, I. (2020). Eponymous technical terms in English special terminology. In: Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future & Communicative Strategies of Information Society: Proceedings of the Joint Conferences: 20th Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future (PCSF 2020) & 12th Communicative Strategies of Information Society (CSIS 2020) (26–27 November, 2020 & 23–24 October, 2020, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russia). London: European Publisher, pp. 410–419. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.03.41 (European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Vol. 98).
10. Qasim, S. (2023).The Power of Eponyms: Exploring Cultural and Social Factors in Their Adoption and Popularization. In: Uruk for Humanities, 16 (4), 49. DOI: 10.52113/uj05/023-16/2636-2647.
11. Rychkova, L. V. (2012). Consubstantiality of terms as a problem of applied linguistics. In: Karpov scientific readings: collection of scientific articles. Iss. 6. Part 1. Minsk: Belorusskiy dom pechati publ., pp. 55–59 (in Russ.).
12. Akhmanova, O. & Agapova, G. (1974). Terminology. Theory and Method. Moscow: Moscow University Press.
13. Gvishiani, N. B. (1986). Language of scientific communication. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola publ. (in Russ.).
14. Sorokina, E. A. (2009). On the validity of identifying the proto-terminological stage in the progressive development of specialized vocabulary. In: Actual problems of the theory and practice of intercultural communication. Iss. 2. Moscow: Moscow Region State University publ., pp. 70–74 (in Russ.).
15. Dubskikh, A. I. (2020). Some aspects of eponyms translation. In: Foreign Languages in the Context of Intercultural Communication: Proceedings of the XII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation (Saratov, February 25–26, 2020). Saratov: Saratovskiy istochnik publ., pp. 331–334 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
118
JATS XML
Email this article 
