Gelotolinguistics: To Substantiate the Allocation of the Concept as a New Understanding of the Phenomenon of Laughter

Aim. To consider the phenomenon of laughter in the modern theoretical interpretation in the aspect of the need to identify gelotolinguistics as a new applied branch of linguistics.

Methodology. In the course of the work, a scientometrical approach was used to analyze scientific publications in recent years in the field of gelotology, the science of humor and its influence on various aspects of public life, justifying the distinction of gelotolinguistics, accumulating linguistic research in the field of laughter. In this connection, the scientific problem of substantiating gelotolinguistics, which studies the laughter language aspects in a circle of related paradigms, is put forward.

Results. The growing interest in understanding the phenomenon of laughter is illustrated. The metalanguage and nomenclature of the study are described. The communicative nature of laughter and its role in both intra- and intercultural translation are proved. It is emphasized that laughter is a component of consciousness, thinking at all linguistic levels: the language system, speech, text and, moreover, in the core of consciousness and in the lexical core through polystatus gelotives.

Research implications. The hypothesis of categorical unity (semiotics, communication and laughing ethics) underlying gelotolinguistics is put forward, indicating the most significant components that make up gelotolinguistics as a new applied branch of linguistics. Gelotives are distinguished as linguistic means of laughing reaction. The article substantiates the position that fiction and folklore are depositories of gelotives and representatives of gelotolinguistics: gelotic semantics, gelotic target, gelotic object, gelotive, polycode means of gelotivity, gelotic euphemisms, gelotic text structure, categorization of gelotic text, the phenomenon of gelotivity and gelotic competence, etc. Various concepts of laughter are analyzed, and the presence of laughter in human consciousness / thinking / speech activity is emphasized. The main problematic branches of gelotolinguistics, as well as its prospects, are listed. 

1. Kapruzova, M. N. & Telpov, R. E., eds. (2015). Humor and satire in the coordinates of the 21st century: a collection of scientific articles based on the materials of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference (Varna, Bulgaria, April 1, 2015). Varna: Paradigma publ. (in Russ.).

2. Gnevek, O. V. (2016). About the conceptual apparatus of gelotology. In: Contemporary gelotology: a collection of scientific articles on materials from the international scientific and practical conference (Varna, 04 November 2016). Varna: Paradigma Publ., pp. 46–67 (in Russ.).

3. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

4. Narsky, I. V., Nagornaya, O. S., Nikonova, O. Yu. et al., eds. (2013). From the sublime to the ridiculous... Instrumentalization of laughter in Russian history of the 20th century. Chelyabinsk: Kamennyy poyas publ. (in Russ.).

5. Petrenko, S. A. & Petrenko, A. F. (2022). Humorous discourse (cognitolinguistic and artistic aspects). Pyatigorsk: Pyatigorsk State University publ. (in Russ.).

6. Getselev, B., Sidneva, T., comps. and eds. (2001). 20 th Century Art: Paradoxes of Risorial Culture. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Conservatory named after M. I. Glinka Publ. (in Russ.).

7. Duskaeva, L. R., ed. (2021). The European Journal of Humor Research. 9 (1): Special issue. Humour in the Media.

8. Sheinov, V. P. (2016). Humor as a way of influence. Moscow: Peter publ. (in Russ.).

9. Karabulatova, I. S. & Zhang, L. (2024). Verbal discrimination in the media space as a reflection of understanding of speech and behavioral aggression: differences in interpretations of East and West. In: Keys of Contemporary Linguistics, 2, 18–39. DOI: 10 18384/2949-5075-2024-2-18-39 (in Russ.).

10. Panchenko, N. N. (2021). Taunt in the modern Russian communication: functional aspect. In: Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 9 (162), 92–96 (in Russ.).

11. Gaynullina, L. V. (2013). Laughter as a physiological, social and linguistic phenomenon of our life. In: Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 35 (326), 34–39 (in Russ.).

12. Fefelova, G. G. (2022). Conceptual sphere of the Russian humorous picture of the world. Ufa: Ufa State Petroleum Technical University publ. (in Russ.).

13. Dikaya, L. A., Lavreshina, A. Yu., Dikiy, I. S., Khawaled, A. & Shegai, K. S. (2017). EEG correlates of humor and insight.In: Russian Psychological Journal, 14 (3), 133–152. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2017.3.7 (in Russ.).

14. Ruch, W. & Proyer, R. T. (2009). Extending the study of gelotophobia: On gelotophiles and katagelasticists. In: Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22 (1-2), 183–212. DOI: 10.1515/ HUMR.2009.009.

15. Akhrenova, N. A., Lunkova, L. N. & Chernyakova, Yu. S. (2024). The Art of Text Analysis. Moscow: Flinta publ. (in Russ.).

16. Ronson, J. (2021). So You've Been Publicly Shamed. Moscow: Eksmo publ. (in Russ.).

17. Belikov, V. G. (2006). From irony and humor to grotesque and satire. The world of laughter in engravings of the 15th–19th centuries. In: “Bookmark: history and modernity”: proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Moscow: International Union of Public Associations of Book Lovers publ., pp. 158–163 (in Russ.).

18. Karabulatova, I. S., Anumyan, K. S., Korovina, S. G. & Krivenko, G. A. (2023). Emoticeme SURPRISE in the News Discourse of Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan and China. In: RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14 (3), 818–840. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-3-818-840.

19. Stefanenko, E. A., Ivanova, E. M., Enikolopov, S. N., Proyer, R. & Ruch W. (2011). The fear of being laughed at diagnostics: Russian adaptation of gelotophobia questionnaire. In: Psychological Journal, 32 (2), 94–108 (in Russ.).

20. Titze, M. (2009). Gelotophobia: The fear of being laughed at. In: Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22 (1–2), 27–48. DOI: 10.1515/HUMR.2009.002.

21. Gal’tsov P. I. & Migdal I. Yu. (2024). Standup as a narrative of personal experience. In: Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics, 1, 25–32. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5075-2024-1-25-32 (in Russ.).

22. Rokotyanskaya, L. O. (2019). Humor: essence, types, functions in society [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).

23. Dorfman, L. Ya. & Kalugin, A. Yu. (2021). Individual-intellectual integrations of man. Moscow: Institute of Psychology publ. (in Russ.).

24. Izard, C. E. (1999). The Psychology of Emotions. St. Petersburg: Peter publ. (in Russ.).

25. Bergerm, A. A. & Gonot-Schoupinsky, F. (2023). Humour and mental health: a case study of Arthur Asa Berger. In: Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 27 (1), 37–50. DOI: 10.1108/MHSI-08-2022-0051.