The title paratextuality of a literary text
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2023-6-60-66
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the contemporary outlook on the intertextuality phenomenon for verbal and nonverbal texts.
Methodology. The basis of the research is the analysis of intertexuality properties and functioning through literary texts observation and analysis.
Results. The analysis conducted states that the title paratextuality is the most productive means of actualizing the intertextual network through semantically multidimentional content.
Research implications. The work generalizes the paratextual effects and mechanisms in literary texts analytical reading. Special focus of the work is laid on the context as a means of building intertextual links in a literary text.
About the Authors
L. N. Lunkova
State University of Humanities and Social Studie
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Larisa N. Lunkova – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Department of Germanic and Romance Languages and their Teaching Methods
ulitsa Zelyonaya 30, Kolomna 140410, Moscow region
I. Yu. Migdal
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina Yu. Migdal – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Department of Translation Studies and Cognitive Linguistics
ulitsa Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Arnold I. V. [The importance of a strong position for the interpretation of a literary text]. In: Inostrannyye yazyki v shkole [Foreign languages at school], 1978. no. 4. Pp. 23–31.
2. Arnold I. V. Problemy dialogizma, intertekstual'nosti i germenevtiki [Problems of dialogism, intertextuality and hermeneutics]. St. Petersburg, Obrazovaniye Publ., 1995. 60 p.
3. Derrida J. Marges de la philosophie (Russ. ed.: Kralechkin D., transl. Polya filosofii. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2012. 376 p.).
4. Il'in I. P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstructivism. Postmodernism]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1996. 256 p.
5. Kozhina N.A. Zaglaviye khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya: struktura, funktsiya, tipologiya, na materiale russkoy prozy XIX-XX vv.: diss. … kand. filol. nauk [Title of a work of art: structure, function, typology based on Russian prose of the 19th-20th centuries: PhD thesis in Philological Sciences]. Moscow, 1986. 230 p.
6. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Kultura i vzryv. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov [Culture and explosion. Inside thinking worlds]. St. Petersburg, Isskustvo-SPB Publ., 2010. 704 p.
7. Magazanik E. [Poetics of the title and table of contents]. In: Materialy XXIII nauchnoy konferentsii. Seriya filologicheskikh nauk (19–22 aprelya 1966 g.) [Materials of the XXIII scientific conference. Philological Science Series (April 19–22, 1966)]. Samarkand, 1966. Pp. 14–15.
8. Engquist N. E. [Context parameters]. In: Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 9. Lingvostilistika [New in foreign linguistics. Iss. 9. Linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1980. Pp. 254–270.
9. Genette G. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press, 1997. 490 p.
10. Broich U., Pfister M. Schulte-Middelich B., hrsg. Intertextualität: Formen, Funktionen, anglist. Falstudien. Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1985. 373 s.
Review
Views:
124
Email this article 
