Preview

Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics

Advanced search

Systematising the definitions of the 'linguocultural concept' in modern linguistics: is it possible to reach a consensus?

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-3-102-111

Abstract

Aim. An attempt to systematise various interpretations of “concept” notion in linguoculturology and cognitive linguistics.
Methodology. The key research method was content analysis. The theoretical and methodological approaches previously outlined by linguists in this field are analysed. The typology of concepts outlined in the works of predecessors in relation to modern challenges and trends is also clarified. Results. The research concludes that the understanding of concepts as linguistic units differs in the works of representatives of different linguistic directions. Proposals for revising the existing concept classification for future research are formulated.
Research implications. The study suggests the need to develop a new classification of concepts, which in turn would facilitate the task of describing as accurately as possible all the linguistic worldviews of all the cultures that have existed or will exist on our globe.

About the Author

V.  I. Suslov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Suslov  – Postgraduate Student, Department of English Linguistics, Philological Faculty; Lecturer, Department of Foreign languages, Economics Faculty 

Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991



References

1. Vorkachev, S. G. (2020). Concept as an “umbrella” term. In: Language. Consciousness. Communication. Iss. 24. Moscow: Max-press publ. pp. 5–12 (in Russ.).

2. Karasik, V. I. (2018). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena publ. (in Russ.).

3. Askoldov, S. A. (1997). Concept and word. In: Russian literature. From the theory of literature to text structure: an anthology. Moscow: Academia publ. pp. 267–269 (in Russ.).

4. Kolesov, V. V (2018). Language and mentality. St. Petersburg: Peterburzhskoye Vostokovedeniye publ. (in Russ.).

5. Telia, V. N. (1996). Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects. Moscow: Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kul'tury” publ. (in Russ.).

6. Karasik, V. I. (2006). Definition and typology of concepts. In: Zolotykh, L. G. (comp.) Word – consciousness – culture: collection of scientific works. Moscow: Flinta publ., Nauka publ. pp. 58–66 (in Russ.).

7. Slyshkin, G. G. (2001). Intercultural competence and the concept of “translation”. In: Language personality: problems of communicative activity. Volgograd: Peremena publ. pp. 60–64 (in Russ.).

8. Tokarev, G. V. (2023). The transfer of cultural functions into the linguacultural system. In: Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 22 (5), 190–198. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.5.15 (in Russ.).

9. Stepanov, Yu. S. (2001). Constants: a dictionary of Russian culture. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt publ. (in Russ.).

10. Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Language and the world of man. Moscow: Yazyk i mir cheloveka publ. (in Russ.).

11. Arutyunova, N. D. (2012). From observations on addressing discourse. In: Logical analysis of language: Addressing discourse. Moscow: Indrik publ. pp. 5–15 (in Russ.).

12. Vishnyakova, O. D. (2009). Cultural concept analysis in the “family resemblance” context. In: Vestnik of Pomor University. Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences, 2, 43–48 (in Russ.).

13. Vishnyakova, O. D. (2002). Language and conceptual space: on the material of modern English. Moscow: MAKS Press publ. (in Russ.).

14. Vishnyakova, O., Minyar-Beloroucheva, A., Sergienko, P. & Vishnyakova, E. (2020). Harmonizing different cognitive styles through reading. In: 5th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences: Conference Proceedings. Belgrade: Center for Open Access in Science. pp. 17–30. URL: https://www.centerprode.com/conferences/5IeCSHSS.html#002 (accessed: 20.07.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.05.02017v.

15. Boldyrev, N. N. (2018). Cognitive semantics: a course of lectures on English philology. Moscow, Berlin: Direct-Media publ. (in Russ.).

16. Kubryakova, E. S. (2002). On the modern understanding of the term “concept” in linguistics and cultural studies. In: Reality, language and consciousness: international interuniversity collection of scientific works. Iss. 2. Moscow, Tambov: Derzhavin Tambov State University publ. pp. 5–15 (in Russ.).

17. Alefirenko, N. F. (2002). Poetic energy of the word. Synergetics of language, consciousness and culture. Moscow: Academia publ. (in Russ.).

18. Popova, Z. D. & Sternin, I. A. (2020). Essays on cognitive linguistics. Mosccow: AST publ., Vostok – Zapad publ. (in Russ.).

19. Wierzbicka, A. (2001). Understanding cultures through their key words. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury publ. (in Russ.).

20. Karasik, V. I. & Slyshkin, G. G. (2001). Linguistic and cultural concept as a unit of research. In: Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics: collection of scientific works. Voronezh: Voronezh State University publ. pp. 75–80 (in Russ.).

21. Baranova, L. L. (2019). The concept of the frontier: its linguistic and cultural significance in American English. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 4, 7–12. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2019-4-7-12.

22. Van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23. Minyar-Beloroucheva, A. P., Sergienko, P. I., Vishnyakova, E. A. & Vishnyakova, O. D. (2020). New Linguiodidactic Challenges In Teaching Professionally Oriented English As Referred To Pr-Education. In: Karasik, V. I. (ed.). Topical Issues of Linguistics and Teaching Methods in Business and Professional Communication. Vol. 97. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. pp. 539–547. URL: https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.02.72 (accessed: 20.07.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.02.72.

24. Whorf, B. L. (2018). Language, thought, and reality; selected writings. Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Supplementary files

Review

Views: 106


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5059 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5075 (Online)