The modern fields of pragmalinguistics research
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2023-4-42-52
Abstract
Aim is to characterize modern fields and trends in pragmalinguistics, to determine their specifics and main research problems.
Methodology. The paper uses the descriptive method, which is a system of procedures for collecting factual material and its description based on observation. The analysis of modern research trends in pragmalinguistics is carried out with the identification of their features and the definition of the main research problems.
Results. A comprehensive overview of modern research fields and trends in pragmalinguistics is given, the main research problems of each trends and fields are characterized.
Research implications. This review provides comprehensive understanding of modern fields and trends in pragmalinguistic research.
About the Author
A. G. Dittrikh
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem G. Dittrikh – Postgraduate Student, Department of German Philology
Universitetskaya naberezhnaya 7–9, St. Petersburg 199034
References
1. Apresyan Yu. D. [Connotations as part of the pragmatics of the word (lexicographic aspect)]. In: Russkiy yazyk. Problema grammaticheskoy semantiki i otsenochnyye faktory v yazyke [Russian language. The problem of grammatical semantics and evaluative factors in language]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992, pp. 45–64.
2. Apresyan Yu. D. [Pragmatics and lexicography: pragmatic information for an explanatory dictionary]. In: Propozitsional'nyye predikaty v logicheskom i lingvisticheskom aspekte. Tezisy rabochego soveshchaniya [Propositional predicates in the logical and linguistic aspect. Abstracts of the workshop]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1987, pp. 6–10.
3. Apresyan Yu. D. [Pragmatic information for an explanatory dictionary]. In: Pragmatika i problemy intensional'nosti [Pragmatics and problems of intensionality]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, pp. 7–44.
4. Baeva G. A. [Historical pragmalinguistics as a special direction in the study of languages]. In: Ocherki po istoricheskoy pragmatike germanskikh yazykov [Essays on the historical pragmatics of Germanic languages]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publ., 2012, pp. 7–19.
5. Bergelson M. B. [Cross-cultural pragmatics]. In: Vvedeniye v nauku o yazyke [Introduction to the science of language]. Moscow, Buki Vedi Publ., 2019, pp. 374–386.
6. Vezhbitskaya A. Sopostavleniye kul'tur cherez posredstvo leksiki i pragmatiki [Comparison of cultures through vocabulary and pragmatics]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury Publ., 2001. 272 p.
7. Zevakhina N. A. [Experimental research in the field of pragmatic implicatures (as one of the areas of linguistic pragmatics)]. In: Problemy yazyka: cbornik nauchnykh statey po materialam Pervoy konferentsii-shkoly «Problemy yazyka: vzglyad molodykh uchenykh» (20–22 sentyabrya 2012 g.) [Problems of language: a collection of scientific articles based on the materials of the First Conference-School "Problems of language: the view of young scientists" (September 20–22, 2012)]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics RAS, 2012, pp. 76–91.
8. Jorgensen M. V., Phillips L. J. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse analysis. Theory and method]. Kharkov,“Gumanitarnyy Tsentr” Publ., 2008. 352 p.
9. Kurchatkina G. P., Nikolaeva Yu. A., Smelkova E. A., Struchkova S. B., Troshina O. V. [Linguopragmatics in the studies of foreign scientists]. In: Al'manakh mirovoy nauki [Almanac of world science], 2018, no. 1 (21), pp. 70–88.
10. Matveeva G. G., Lenets A. V., Petrova E. I. Osnovy pragmalingvistiki [Fundamentals of pragmalinguistics]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2013. 232 p.
11. Matveyeva G. G., Samarina I. V., Seliverstova L. N. [The two directions in modern pragmalinguistics]. In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy], 2009, no. 1-2, pp. 50–57.
12. Puritskaya Ye. V. [The pragmatic component of the lexical meaning of the word and its reflection in the dictionary of pragmatics]. In: Yazykovaya norma i rechevaya praktika v Orenburgskom regione: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Orenburg, Orenburgskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet, 14 oktyabrya 2016 g.): v 2 ch. Ch. 1. [Language norm and speech practice in the Orenburg region: materials of the International Scientific Conference (Orenburg, Orenburg State Pedagogical University, October 14, 2016): in 2 parts. Part 1]. Orenburg, „Orenburgskaya kniga“ Publ., 2016, pp. 109–112.
13. Rzazade G. Ch. [Cross-cultural communication and the causes of communication socio-linguistic failures in questions]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics], 2019, no. 6, pp. 86–91. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2019-6-86-91.
14. Ruzhitsky I. V. [The pragmatic component of the meaning of the word (based on Russian modal particles and interjections)]. In: Reosiahag (Journal of Institute of Russian Studies, Chungbuk National University), 2007, no. 3, pp. 65–79.
15. Teliya V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya: Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul'turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology: Semantic, pragmatic and linguoculturological aspects]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul'tury Publ., 1996. 288 p.
16. Teliya V. N. [Expressiveness as a manifestation of the subjective factor in language and its pragmatic orientation]. In: Yazykovyye mekhanizmy ekspressivnosti [Language mechanisms of expressiveness]. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 5–36.
17. Formanovskaya N. I. Rechevoye vzaimodeystviye: kommunikatsiya i pragmatika [Speech interaction: communication and pragmatics]. Moscow, IKAR Publ., 2007. 408 p.
18. Betten A. Zum Verhältnis von geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache im Frühneuhochdeutschen. In: von Besch W., Betten A., Reichmann O., Sonderegger S., hrsg. Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2. vollst. neu bearb. u. erw. Aufl. 2. Teilb. Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter, 2000, S. 1646–1666.
19. Blutner R. Lexikalische Pragmatik. In: Liedtke F., Tuchen A., eds. Handbuch Pragmatik. Stuttgart, J. B. Metzler, 2018, S. 106–112.
20. Cherubim D. Zum Programm einer historischen Sprachpragmatik. In: von Sitta H., hrsg. Ansätze zu einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichte. Züricher Kolloquium 1978. Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1980, S. 3–21.
21. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London, Longman, 1995. 265 p.
22. Henne H. Probleme einer historischen Gesprächsanalyse. In: von Sitta H., hrsg. Ansätze zu einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichte. Züricher Kolloquium 1978. Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1980. S. 89–102.
23. Jäger G. Evolutionary game theory and typology: A case study. In: Language, 2007, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 74–109. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2007.0020.
24. Jucker A. H. Historische Pragmatik. In: Liedtke F., Tuchen A., eds. Handbuch Pragmatik. Stuttgart, J. B. Metzler, 2018. S. 132–139.
25. Noveck I. Experimental Pragmatics: The Making of a Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018. 274 p.
26. Reisigl M. Kritische Duskursanalyse. In: Liedtke F., Tuchen A., eds. Handbuch Pragmatik. Stuttgart, J. B. Metzler, 2018. S. 163–174.
27. Schlieben-Lange B. Für eine historische Analyse von Sprechakten. In: hrsg. von Weber H., Weydt H., hrsg. Sprachtheorie und Pragmatik. Akten des 10. Linguistischen Kolloquiums. Bd. 1. Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1976, S 113–119 (Linguistische Arbeiten 31).
28. Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986. 279 p.
29. Van Dijk T. A. Critical Discourse Studies: a sociocognitive approach. In: Ruth Wodak R., Meyer K. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis; 2nd edition. London, Sage, 2009, pp. 62–86.
30. Van Leeuwen T. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press, 2008. 172 p.
31. Wierzbicka A. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin, New York, De Gruyter Mouton, 2009. 502 p.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
239
Email this article 
