EMPIRICAL METHODS OF STUDYING A LINGUISTIC PHENOMENON OF INTERSUBJECTIVITY (COMPARATIVE REPORT AND OBSERVATION OF BEHAVIOUR)
Abstract
This article is intended to reflect the multiplicity
of meanings concerning the phenomenon of intersubjectivity;
to facilitate empirical research on intersubjectivity by means
of analysis of efficient methodologies and research branches;
and to anticipate potential opportunities for research in this
field. In this article various empirical attempts of studying
intersubjectivity and intersubjective relations between either
people or human perspectives are described in a way, fully
portraying the very essence of these concepts, their possible
use and connection with modern sciences, providing a
model for a modern scientist to follow in order to enlarge his
research with an experiment leading to a deeper realization
of intersubjective interaction processes both between point
of view of one concrete individual, different people or groups
of people.
of meanings concerning the phenomenon of intersubjectivity;
to facilitate empirical research on intersubjectivity by means
of analysis of efficient methodologies and research branches;
and to anticipate potential opportunities for research in this
field. In this article various empirical attempts of studying
intersubjectivity and intersubjective relations between either
people or human perspectives are described in a way, fully
portraying the very essence of these concepts, their possible
use and connection with modern sciences, providing a
model for a modern scientist to follow in order to enlarge his
research with an experiment leading to a deeper realization
of intersubjective interaction processes both between point
of view of one concrete individual, different people or groups
of people.
References
1. Жирова И.Г. Лингвистическая категория эмфа- тичность в антропоцентрическом аспекте: моно- графия. - М.: Изд-во МГОУ, 2008. - 246 с.
2. Карасик В.И. Языковые ключи. - М.: Гнозис, 2009. - 406 с.
3. Караулов Ю.Н. Русский язык и языковая лич- ность. - Изд. 7-е. - М.: ЛКИ, 2010. - 264 с.
4. Колшанский Г.В. Объективная картина мира в познании и языке. - М.: Наука, 1990. - 103 с.
5. Попова З.Д., Стернин И.А. Когнитивная линг- вистика. - М.: АСТ, Восток-Запад, 2007. - 315 c.
6. Славская А.Н. Личность как субъект интерпре- тации. - Дубна: Феникс+, 2011. - 240 с.
7. Филипсон М. Феноменологическая философия и социология // Новые направления в социоло- гической теории. - М., 1978. - С. 204-271.
8. Cast A.D., Stets J.E. & Burke P.J. Does the Self Conform to the Views of Others? // Social Psychology Quarterly, № 62 (1), 1999. - P. 68-82.
9. Castaneda C. The Journey to Ixtlan. - NY: Simon and Schuster, 1971. - 268 p.
10. Castaneda C. The Art of Dreaming. - USA: Harper Collins Publishers Inc., 2004. - 260 p.
11. Coelho N.E. & Figueiredo L.C. Patterns of Intersubjectivity in the Constitution of Subjectivity: Dimensions of Otherness // Culture & Psychology, № 62 (1), 2003. - P. 193-208.
12. Crossley N. Intersubjectivity: The Fabric of Social Becoming. - London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1996. - 188 p.
13. Gardenfors P. The Role of Intersubjectivity in Animal and Human Cooperation // Biological Theory, № 3 (1), 2008. - P. 51-62.
14. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. - UK: Polity Press Cambridge, 1984. - 288 p.
15. Gilbert S., Laingian A. View of the Advantage of Advertisers Over Consumers // Psychology & Marketing, 1986. - P. 61-65
16. Gillespie A. The Intersubjective Dynamics of Trust, Distrust and Manipulation // In I. Markova & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural Perspectives. - Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2007. - P. 131-152.
17. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. - London: Penguin, 1959. - 251 p.
18. Hatfield E., Cacioppo J. & Rapson R. Emotional Contagion. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. - P. 96-99
19. Hurley S.L. & Chater N. Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science. - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005. - 1024 p.
20. Jovchelovitch S. Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community, and Culture. - London: Routledge, 2007. - 288 p.
21. Laing R.D., Phillipson H. & Lee A.R. Interpersonal Perception: A Theory and Method of Research. - London: Tavistock Publications, 1966. - 230 p.
22. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of Perception. - London: Routledge, 1945. - 544 p.
23. Mori J., Hayashi M. The Achievement of Intersubjectivity through Embodied Completions: A Study of Interactions between First and Second Language Speakers. Applied Linguistics, № 27 (2), 2006. - P. 195-219.
24. ODonnell C.R., Tharp R.G. & Wilson K. Activity Settings as the Unit of Analysis: A Theoretical Basis for Community Intervention and Development. American Journal of Community Psychology, № 21 (4), 1993. - P. 501-520.
25. Rommetveit R. On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity // In R. Rommetveit & R. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of Language, thought and Verbal Communication. - London: Academic Press, 1979. - P. 93-107.
26. Schegloff E.A. Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of Uh-Huh and Other Things that Come between Sentences // In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analysing Discourse: Text and Talk. - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1982. - P. 71-93.
27. Schutz A. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. - The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973. - 361 p.
28. Shrauger J.S. & Schoeneman T.J. Symbolic Interactionist View of Self-Concept: Through the Looking Glass Darkly. Psychological Bulletin, № 86, 1979. - P. 549-573.
29. Sillars A., Koerner A. & Fitzpatrick M. Communication and Understanding in Parent-Adolescent Relationships // Human Communication, № 21 (1), 2005. - P. 102-128.
30. Stryker S. Relationships of Married Offspring and Parent: A Test of Meads Theory. The American Journal of Sociology, № 62 (3), 1956. - P. 308-319.
Review
Views:
49
Email this article 
