Linguistic translation studies: the page of the past or actual present?
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2026-2-1-66-79
Abstract
Aim. The aim is to explore the essence of the concept of “linguistic translation studies,” to demonstrate the general and specific features inherent in its various representatives, and to substantiate the position on the continued relevance of many of its postulates today.
Methodology. The body of texts related to this subject is examined. The relation of the Russian and foreign authors to the linguistic translation studies is covered. The existing opinions about this problem are analyzed and critically estimated.
Results. It is proved, that the tendency to fundamental revision of the linguistic translation studies principles and to abdicate its notions and categories as the passed stage in the development of translation science is one-sided and can`t be justified. So, its preservation as the part of the speciality 5.9.8 General, comparative and applied linguistics is quite reasonable.
Research implications. The factual data presented in this paper, as well as the conclusions of the authors clarify some substantial methodological aspects of the linguistic translation studies and show the necessity of using its apparatus in further investigation in this sphere. The results of this work may be used in teaching the courses of the theory and history of translation.
About the Authors
G. T. Khukhuni
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgy T. Khukhuni – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Department of theory of Language, Anglistics and Applied Linguistics
Moscow
A. A. Osipova
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Osipova – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Departmental Head, Department of Comparative Linguistics
Moscow
References
1. Chaykovskiy, R. R. (2016). Light and shadows of modern translation studies in Russia. In: Lomonosov Translation Studies Jounal, 4, 5–25 (in Russ.).
2. Prunč, E. (2012). Entwicklungslinien der Translationswissenschaft. Von den Asymmetrien der Sprachen zu den Asymmetrien der Macht. 3., erw. und verb. Aufl. Berlin: Frank und Timme.
3. Bodrova (Gorzhenios), T. I. (2021). Russian Translation Studies in Light of the Interpretative Theory of Translation (Theory, Practice, and Teaching Methods). Voronezh: Nauka-UNINPRESS publ. (in Russ.).
4. Garbovsky, N. K. (2023). Translation Theory (Series: Classic University Textbook). Moscow: Moscow University publ. (in Russ.).
5. Wedland, E. R. (2023). Exploring Theory and Practice of Modern Bible Translating: A Selected Overview. In: HTPL Novum, 8 (1), 5–27. DOI: 10.7146/hn.v8i1.143104.
6. Merz, J. (2023). Bible Transmediation in Theory and Practice. In: The Bible Translator, 74 (2), 213–230. DOI: 10.1177/205167702211508.
7. King, Ph. & Kroneman, D. (2022). The Landscape of Bible Translation in the 21st Century. In: EMQ (Evangelical Missions Quarterly), 58 (3), 15–19.
8. Desnitsky, A. S. (2015). Modern biblical translation: theory and methodology. Moscow: Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University publ. (in Russ.).
9. Matyushin, I. M. (2024). Relevance of linguistic theory of translation and translation practice. In: Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 5 (886), 70–77 (in Russ.).
10. Reiß, K. & Vermeer, H. J. (2014). Towards a General Theory of Translational Action. Skopos Theory Explained. London, New York: Routledge.
11. Komissarov, V. N. (ed.) (1978). Translation Theory in Foreign Linguistics. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya publ. (in Russ.).
12. Schweitzer, A. D. (1988). Translation Theory: Status, Problems, and Aspects. Moscow: Nauka publ. (in Russ.).
13. Azov, A. G. (2013). Defeated literalists. From the history of literary translation in the USSR in the 1920s-1960s. Moscow: Higher School of Economics publ. (in Russ.).
14. Baskina (Malikova), M. E. (2021). Philologically Accurate Translation of the 1920s–1930s: People and Institutions. In: Baskina, M. E. & Filicheva, V. V. (eds.). Artistic and Philological Translation of the 1920s–1930s. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya publ., pp. 5–82 (in Russ.).
15. Nida, E. A. & Taber, Ch. R. (2003). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
16. Larin, B. A. (1962). Our tasks. In: Larin, B. A. (ed.) Theory and criticism of translation. Leningrad: Leningrad State University publ., pp. 3–7 (in Russ.).
17. Mishkurov, E. N. (2025). Military translators and interpreters of the Great Patriotic War (1941–1945) as the arts’ founders of the modern domestic philology and translation. In: Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal, 18 (2), 57–81. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2074-6636-22-2025-18-2-57-8 (in Russ.).
18. Sdobnikov, V. V. (2022). Rethinking Translation Categories – Rethinking Translation. In: Military-Humanitarian Almanac. Series “Linguistics”. Iss. 7. Vol. 1: Proceedings of the XVI International Scientific Conference on Actual Problems of Language and Communication “Language. Communication. Translation” (Moscow, June 24, 2022). Moscow: Military University publ., pp. 60–75 (in Russ.).
19. Nord, Chr. (2018). Translating as a Purposeful Activity. Functional Approaches Explained. London and New York: Routledge.
20. Ivanov, N. V. (2023). On the Rhetorical Aspect of Translation Analysis (in Defense of the Transformational Approach to Translation). In: Military-Humanitarian Almanac. Series “Linguistics”. Iss. 8: Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific Conference on Actual Problems of Language and Communication “Language. Communication. Translation” (Moscow, June 30, 2023). Moscow: Military University publ., pp. 33–41 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
18
JATS XML
Email this article 
