Contrastive imagery as the basis of aspectual distinction
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2024-4-110-122
Abstract
Aim. To consider the cognitive mechanisms underlying the formation of aspectual semantics of English tense-aspect grammatical constructions.
Methodology. The research material comprises the definitions of key tense-aspect grammatical constructions, selected from English-English dictionaries and textbooks on English grammar by foreign authors. Using the methods of componential, cognitive and interpretive analysis of meanings, the levels of metaphorization reflecting the process of generating aspectual semantics are studied.
Results. The study showed that the opposition of aspectual meanings is based on the contrast of images that form the meanings of grammatical constructions.
Research implications. A methodology for analyzing the level-by-level construction of aspectual semantics has been developed. Conceptual schemes that reflect the contrasting images underlying the aspectual opposition are presented.
About the Author
N. S. Skvortsova
Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Skvortsova – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Assoc. Prof., Department of Linguistics and Political Communications
ulitsa Ostozhenka 38 build. 1, Moscow 119034
References
1. Bondarko, A. V. (2005). Theory of morphological categories and aspectological studies. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury publ. (in Russ.).
2. Zaliznyak, A. A., Mikaelyan, I. L. & Shmelev, A. D. (2015). Russian aspectology: in defense of the aspectual pair. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury publ. (in Russ.).
3. Maslov, Yu. S. (2004). Selected works. Aspectology. Linguistics. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury publ. (in Russ.).
4. Binnick, R. I., ed. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Motov, S. V. (2019). Teaching English grammar on linguocognitive basis. In: Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 24 (179), 32–39. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2019-24-179-32-39 (in Russ.).
6. Rakhmankulova, S. Y. (2020). Cognitive linguistics approaches to teaching foreign grammar. In: Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University Bulletin, 49, 86–103. DOI: 10.47388/2072-3490/lunn2020-49-1-86-103 (in Russ.).
7. I lchenko, O. S. (2022). Cognitive grammar and English language acquisition: Indefinite Tenses, or when the ‘observational window’ is closed. In: Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 3 (31). URL: https://rulb.org/archive/3-31-2022-july/10.18454/RULB.2022.31.22 (accessed: 20.03.2024). DOI: 10.18454/ RULB.2022.31.22.
8. Avramov, G. G. (2016). On the issue of the linguistic status of the category of boundedness/unboundedness in contemporary French. In: Philology. Theory & Practice, 10-3 (64), 66–69 (in Russ.).
9. Baklashkina, O. N., Melgunova, A. G. & Smetanina, T. V. (2021). A cognitive approach to the interpretation of the meanings of infinitive forms in English. In: International Research Journal, 7-3 (109), 6–10. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.109.7.068 (in Russ.).
10. Besedina, N. A. (2010). Role of morphological categories in language organization as a cognitive system. In: Cognitive studies of language, 7, 363–371 (in Russ.).
11. Beloshapkova, T. V. (2008). The cognitive-discursive paradigm of linguistic knowledge and the category of aspectuality. In: Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology, 2, 34–43 (in Russ.).
12. Bolotova, E. V. (2015). The cognitive representation of the limit in the text (in the German language). In: Bulletin of Bashkir State University, 20 (3), 993–996 (in Russ.).
13. Gillespie, D. C., Murunov, S. S., Bryxina, I. E. & Aleksic, E. V. (2020). An analysis of semantic characteristics of English and French tense forms in the space of the future. In: Language and Culture, 51, 6–34. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/51/1 (in Russ.).
14. Shiryaeva, A. S. (2021). Cognitive meanings of present perfect in a journalistic style. In: Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 4 (28), 35–38. DOI: 10.18454/RULB.2021.28.4.11 (in Russ.).
15. Brisard, F. (2014). An Account of English tense and aspect in Cognitive Grammar. In: Jaszczolt, K. M. & de Saussure, L., eds. Time: Language, Cognition & Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 210–235. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589876.003.0011.
16. Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. Radden, G. & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
19. Schmid, S. D. (2022). Universal Categories, Single Language Realisations: Aspectuality in French and other Romance Languages. In: CogniTextes, 23. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/cognitextes/2292 (accessed: 11.04.2024). DOI: 10.4000/cognitextes.2292.
20. Langacker, R. W. (2000). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Rykhlova, O. S. (2007). To the question of category of type in the English language. In: Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, 6 (70), 4–9 (in Russ.).
22. Sternin, I. A. (2001). Methodology for studying the structure of a concept. In: Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics. Voronezh: Voronezh State University publ. pp. 58–65 (in Russ.).
23. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyterp.
25. Langacker, R. W. (2013). Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Egizaryan, P. E. (2019). Lexical and grammatical means of expressing the future in the Pyrenean variant of modern Portuguese (based on print media) [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).
27. Chertkova, M. Yu. (2005). Typology of the type/aspect category in differently structured languages of the world [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).
28. Mirsanov, G. K. (2018). Role of quantifiers in the formation of aspectual situation (in the English language). In: Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 2, 109–117. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2018-2-109-117.
Review
Views:
106
Email this article 
