linmgouВопросы современной лингвистикиKey Issues of Contemporary Linguistics2949-50592949-5075Federal State University of Education10.18384/2949-5075-2025-2-84-100linmgou-1772Research ArticleТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКАЯ, ПРИКЛАДНАЯ И СРАВНИТЕЛЬНО-СОПОСТАВИТЕЛЬНАЯ ЛИНГВИСТИКАTHEORETICAL, APPLIED AND COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICSИспользование императивов водителями общественного транспорта («Ангкот») в городе Бандунг (Индонезия)The Use of Imperatives by Public Transportation (Angkot) Drivers in Bandung City, Indonesiahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2774-0685Супиан.Supian.

 Супиан  – кандидат филологических наук, преподаватель по русскому языку и литературе факультета гуманитарных наук 

г . Бандунг

 Supian  – Ph .D in Linguistics, Faculty of Cultural Science; Lecturer, Russian Language and Literature Study Program

Bandung

supian@unpad.ac.idhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-8775-5109Ладината.Ladinata.

 Ладината  – магистр, преподаватель по русскому языку и литературе факультета гуманитарных наук 

г . Бандунг

Ladinata – M .A . in Linguistics, Faculty of Cultural Science; Lecturer, Russian Language and Literature Study Program

Bandung

ladinata@unpad.ac.idhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-1230ДаллионоР.DallyonoR.

Даллионо Русван – доктор лингвистики кафедры английской литературы факультета образования в области языка и литературы, преподаватель программы по английскому языку и литературе

г . Бандунг

Ruswan Dallyono  – Doctor in Linguistics, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature Education; Lecturer, English Language and Literature Study Program

Bandung

ruswan.dallyono@upi.eduhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-0658-1165ЮдистираР. С.YudistiraR. S.

 Юдистира Ренальди Серби  – бакалавр кафедры английской литературы факультета образования в области языка и литературы, студент программы по английскому языку и литературе

г . Бандунг

Renaldy Serby Yudistira  – Bachelor Degree Holder, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature Education; Student, English Language and Literature Study Program

Bandung

yudistirarenaldyserby@upi.eduУниверситет ПаджаджаранИндонезияPadjadjaran UniversityIndonesiaУниверситет педагогического образования ИндонезииИндонезияIndonesia University of EducationIndonesia2025230620250284100Copyright © Супиан .., Ладината .., Даллионо Р., Юдистира Р.С., 20252025Супиан .., Ладината .., Даллионо Р., Юдистира Р.С.Supian .., Ladinata .., Dallyono R., Yudistira R.S.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.linguamgou.ru/jour/article/view/1772Цель

Цель. Данное исследование направлено на изучение вариации императивного наклонения в диалогических сценах между пассажирами и водителями «Ангкот», популярного вида общественного транспорта в городе Бандунг (Индонезия), с применением синтаксического и речевого подходов для выявления коммуникативных стратегий и понимания императивной силы водителей общественного транспорта в городе Бандунг.

 Процедура и методы

 Процедура и методы. В этом исследовании был применён качественный подход. Данные были собраны с помощью аудиозаписи (с разрешения водителя) во время поездки по указанному маршруту.

 Результаты

 Результаты. Данное исследование показало, что водители «Ангкот» преимущественно используют директивно-императивные предложения, среди которых команды (56,84%), советы (14,73%) и приглашения (12,63%). Эти императивные предложения, используемые водителями общественного транспорта, играют важную роль в регулировании и направлении поведения пассажиров в транспортном средстве.

 Теоретическая и/или практическая значимость. Результаты исследования представляют ценные сведения о динамике императивных предложений в контексте общественного транспорта «Ангкот» в городе Бандунг. Исследование предлагает всесторонний анализ коммуникативных стратегий, используемых водителями, классифицируя и идентифицируя типы императивной силы, что обогащает наше понимание дискурса во взаимодействиях в общественном транспорте.

Aim

Aim. This research aims to investigate the variation of imperative mood in dialogic scenes between passengers and drivers in Angkot, a popular mode of public transportation in Bandung, Indonesia, by applying syntax and speech act approaches to identify communicative strategies and understand the imperative power of public transportation (Angkot) drivers in Bandung City.

 Methodology

 Methodology. A qualitative approach was applied in this research. The data were collected through audio recordings (with the driver’s permission) while traveling on the specified route.

 Results

 Results. This study reveals that Angkot drivers predominantly use directive-imperative sentences, with commands (56.84%), advice (14.73%), and invitations (12.63%). These imperative sentences used by public transportation (Angkot) drivers play a crucial role in regulating and guiding their passenger behavior in the vehicle.

 Research Implications

 Research Implications. The research findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of imperative sentences in the context of public transportation (Angkot) in Bandung City. It offers a comprehensive analysis of the communicative strategies used by drivers, classifying and identifying the types of imperative power, thereby enriching our understanding of discourse in public transportation interactions.

императивные предложенияобщественный транспортводители «Ангкот»коммуникативные стратегииречевые актыimperative sentencespublic transportationAngkot driverscommunicative strategiesand speech actsReferencesLinguistic and temporal resources of pre-stored utterances in everyday conversations / I. Savolainen, A. Klippi, T. Tykkyläinen, K. Launonen // Child Language Teaching and Therapy. 2020. Vol. 36. Iss. 3. P. 195–214. DOI: 10.1177/0265659020950388.Savolainen, I., Klippi, A., Tykkyläinen, T. & Launonen, K. (2020). Linguistic and temporal resources of pre-stored utterances in everyday conversations. In: Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 36 (3), 195–214. DOI: 10.1177/0265659020950388.Бхатти Н. В., Харитонова Е. Ю. Способы выражения вежливости в речевых актах в индоевропейских языках (на материале русского, английского, немецкого и урду) // Вопросы современной лингвистики. 2024. № 4. С. 6–17. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5075-2024-4-6-1.Bhatti, N. V. & Kharitonova, E. Yu. (2024). Means of expressing politeness in speech acts in Indo-European languages (based on Russian, English, German and Urdu). In: Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics, 4, 6–17. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5075-2024-4-6-17 (in Russ.).Дубровченко Е. М. Реакции на изменение коммуникативной дистанции в англоязычном общении // Вопросы современной лингвистики. 2023. № 4. C. 53–62. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5075-2023-4-53-62.Dubrovchenko, E. M. (2023). Reactions to changes in communicative distance in English communication. In: Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics, 4, 53–62. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5075-2023-4-53-62 (in Russ.).Biryulin L. A., Xrakovski V. S. Imperative sentences: theoretical problems // Typology of imperative constructions / ed. V. S. Xrakovski. Munich: Lincom, 2001. P. 3–50.Biryulin, L. A. & Xrakovski, V. S. (2001). Imperative sentences: theoretical problems. In: Xrakovski, V. S., ed. Typology of imperative constructions. Munich: Lincom, pp. 3–50.Hamblin C. L. Imperatives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987. 262 p.Hamblin, C. L. (1987). Imperatives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Barker S. J. Renewing meaning: a speech-act theoretic approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004. 325 p.Barker, S. J. (2004). Renewing meaning: a speech-act theoretic approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Han C.-H. The structure and interpretation of imperatives: mood and force in universal grammar. New York: Garland, 2000. 263 p.Han, C.-H. (2000). The structure and interpretation of imperatives: mood and force in universal grammar. New York: Garland.Jary M., Kissine M. Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 336 p.Jary, M. & Kissine, M. (2014). Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Faisal Septiaji, Safina Rihhadatul’aisy Sudibiyo, Sumarlam. Analisis Bentuk dan Fungsi Kalimat Imperatif Dalam Film Top Gun: Maverick // Translation and Linguistics (Transling). 2023. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 38–48. DOI: 10.20961/transling.v3i01.67783.Faisal Septiaji, Safina Rihhadatul’aisy Sudibiyo & Sumarlam (2023). Analisis Bentuk dan Fungsi Kalimat Imperatif Dalam Film Top Gun: Maverick. In: Translation and Linguistics (Transling), 3 (1), 38–48. DOI: 10.20961/transling.v3i01.67783.Хо М., Чанг В. М. Индексальные и последовательные свойства критических замечаний в начале коммуникации: подходы к изучению (не)вежливости в кросс-культурном аспекте (Indexical and Sequential Properties of Criticisms in Initial Interactions: Implications for Examining (Im) Politeness across Cultures) // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2019. Vol. 23. № 4. C. 904–929. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-904-929.Haugh, M. & Chang, W. M. (2019). Indexical and Sequential Properties of Criticisms in Initial Interactions: Implications for Examining (Im) Politeness across Cultures. In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23 (4), 904–929. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-904-929.Ruytenbeek N. Indirect requests, relevance, and politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 2019. Vol. 142. P. 78–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.007.Ruytenbeek, N. (2019). Indirect requests, relevance, and politeness. In: Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 78–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.007.Jary M., Mikhail K. When terminology matters: the imperative as a comparative concept // Linguistics. 2016. Vol. 54. Iss. 1. P. 119–148. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2015-0039.Jary, M. & Mikhail, K. (2016). When terminology matters: the imperative as a comparative concept. In: Linguistics, 54 (1), 119–148. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2015-0039.Let’s talk emotions: a case study on affective grammar / M. Clark, N. Khaled, M. Kohn, S. Armoskaite // Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. 2019. Vol. 4 (1). Article no. 20. DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.678.Clark, M., Khaled, N., Kohn, M. & Armoskaite, S. (2019). Let’s talk emotions: a case study on affective grammar. In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4 (1), article no. 20. DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.678.Scarantino A. How to do things with emotional expressions: the theory of affective pragmatics // Psychological Inquiry. 2017. Vol. 28. Iss. 2-3. P. 165–185. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2017.1328951.Scarantino, A. (2017). How to do things with emotional expressions: the theory of affective pragmatics. In: Psychological Inquiry, 28 (2-3), 165–185. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2017.1328951.Auwera J. van der, Dobrushina N., Goussev, V. Imperative-hortative systems // The World Atlas of language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 294–296.Auwera, J. van der, Dobrushina, N. & Goussev, V. (2005). Imperative-hortative systems. In: Haspelmath, M., ed. The World Atlas of language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 286–289.Nurmisliah, Oktariza D., Asridayani. Syntactic analysis of imperative sentence in Jambi Malay Language Jangkat isolect // Krinok: Jurnal Linguistik Budaya. 2017. Vol. 2. Iss. 2. P. 15–22. DOI: 10.36355/krinok.v2i2.138.Nurmisliah, Oktariza, D. & Asridayani (2017). Syntactic analysis of imperative sentence in Jambi Malay Language Jangkat isolect. In: Krinok: Jurnal Linguistik Budaya, 2 (2), 15–22. DOI: 10.36355/krinok.v2i2.138.Szeteli A., Dóla M., Alberti G. Pragmasemantic analysis of the Hungarian inferential: evidential expression szerint // Studies in Polish Linguistics. 2019. Special Volume 1. P. 207–225. DOI: 10.4467/23005920SPL.19.013.10993.Szeteli, A., Dóla, M. & Alberti, G. (2019). Pragmasemantic analysis of the Hungarian inferential: evidential expression szerint. In: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Special Volume 1, 207–225. DOI: 10.4467/23005920SPL.19.013.10993.Amral S., Ulfah S. D. Analisis Kalimat Imperatif Pada Tuturan Masyarakat Desa Teluk Raya Kecamatan Kumpeh Kabupaten Muaro Jambi (Kajian Pragmatik) // Aksara: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. 2020. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 232–242.Amral, S. & Ulfah, S. D. (2020). Analisis Kalimat Imperatif Pada Tuturan Masyarakat Desa Teluk Raya Kecamatan Kumpeh Kabupaten Muaro Jambi (Kajian Pragmatik). In: Aksara: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 3 (2), 232–242.Yuniarsi N., Supriadin S., Rahmawati R. An Analysis of Imperative Sentences in Sumbawanese // Linguistics and ELT Journal. 2020. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 1–9. DOI: 10.31764/leltj.v7i1.999.Yuniarsi, N., Supriadin, S. & Rahmawati, R. (2020). An Analysis of Imperative Sentences in Sumbawanese. In: Linguistics and ELT Journal, 7 (1), 1–9. DOI: 10.31764/leltj.v7i1.999.Hariadi J., Rahayu T., Hidayat M. T. Analisis Pemakaian Kalimat Imperatif Dalam Proses Jual Beli Di Pusat Perbelanjaan (Langsa Town Square) // Jurnal Samudra Bahasa. 2022. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 39–48. DOI: 10.33059/jsb.v5i2.6411.Hariadi, J., Rahayu, T. & Hidayat, M. T. (2022). Analisis Pemakaian Kalimat Imperatif Dalam Proses Jual Beli Di Pusat Perbelanjaan (Langsa Town Square). In: Jurnal Samudra Bahasa, 5 (2), 39–48. DOI: 10.33059/jsb.v5i2.6411.An Analysis of Imperative Sentences Uttered by The Education Office in Indonesia / R. Rosmalia, Y Febrianti, H. Masduqi, E. L. Zen // JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts. 2023. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 311–322. DOI: 10.17977/um064v3i22023p311-322.Rosmalia, R., Febrianti, Y., Masduqi, H. & Zen, E. L. (2023). An Analysis of Imperative Sentences Uttered by The Education Office in Indonesia. In: JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 3 (2), 311–322. DOI: 10.17977/um064v3i22023p311-322.Supian, Ladinata, Dallyono R. Russian Imperative: Semantic, Structural and Pragmatic Features. Bandung: CV Balatin Putera Puteri, 2024. 224 p.Supian, Ladinata & Dallyono, R. (2024). Russian Imperative: Semantic, Structural and Pragmatic Features. Bandung: CV Balatin Putera Puteri.Aikhenvald A. Y. Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 520 p.Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2010). Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Searle, J. R. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts // Language, mind and knowledge / ed. K. Gunderson. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1975. P. 344–369. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 7).Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In: Gunderson, K. (ed.). Language, mind and knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 344–369. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 7).Alston W. P. Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000. 352 p.Alston, W. P. (2000). Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Kamp H. Free choice permission // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1974. Vol. 74. Iss. 1. P. 57–74. DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/74.1.57.Kamp, H. (1974). Free choice permission. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 74 (1), 57–74. DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/74.1.57.Searle J. R. How to derive “ought” from “is” // Philosophical Review. 1964. Vol. 73. No. 1. P. 43–58. DOI: 10.2307/2183201.Searle, J. R. (1964). How to derive “ought” from “is”. In: Philosophical Review, 73 (1), 43–58. DOI: 10.2307/2183201.Sadock J., Zwicky A. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In: Language Typology and Syntactic Description / ed. T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. P. 155–196.Sadock, J. & Zwicky, A. (1985). Speech act distinctions in syntax. In: Shopen, T. (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–196.Chierchia G., McConnell-Ginet S. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics; 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. 573 p.Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2000). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Reis M. On sentence types in German: An enquiry into the relationship between grammar and pragmatics // Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis. 1999. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 195–236.Reis, M. (1999). On sentence types in German: An enquiry into the relationship between grammar and pragmatics. In: Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis, 4 (2), 195–236.Baker C. L. Notes of the description of English questions // Foundations of Language, 1970. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 197–219.Baker, C. L. (1970). Notes of the description of English questions. In: Foundations of Language, 6 (2), 197–219.Cheng L. On the Typology of wh-questions: PhD Dissertation. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 1991. 237 p.Cheng, L. (1991). On the Typology of wh-questions: PhD Dissertation. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Han C. H. The structure and interpretation of imperatives: mood and force in Universal Grammar: PhD Dissertation in Liguistics. Philadephia, 1998. 237 p.Han, C. H. (1998). The structure and interpretation of imperatives: mood and force in Universal Grammar: PhD Dissertation in Liguistics. Philadephia.Rivero M. L., Terzi A. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood // Journal of Linguistics. 1995. Vol. 31. Iss. 2. P. 301–322. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700015620.Rivero, M. L. & Terzi, A. (1995). Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. In: Journal of Linguistics, 31 (2), 301–322. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700015620.Rizzi L. Speculations on verb-second // Grammar in Progress / J. Mascaró, M. Nespor (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1990. P. 137–152.Rizzi, L. (1990). Speculations on verb-second. In: Mascaró, J. & Nespor, M., eds. Grammar in Progress. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 137–152.Zanuttini R., Pak M., Portner P. A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects // Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 2012. Vol. 30. P. 1231–1274. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-012-9176-2.Zanuttini, R., Pak, M. & Portner, P. (2012). A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. In: Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30, 1231–1274. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-012-9176-2.Формановская Н. И. Речевое взаимодействие. Коммуникация и прагматика. М.: ИКАР, 2007. 478 с.Formanovskaya, N. I. (2007). Speech interaction: communication and pragmatics. Moscow, IKAR (in Russ.).Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. 168 p.Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Condoravdi C., Lauer S. Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force // Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9 / ed. Ch. Piñón. Paris: Universite Paris, 2012. P. 37–58.Condoravdi, C. & Lauer, S. (2012). Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force. In: Piñón., Ch., ed. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9. Paris: Universite Paris, pp. 37–58.Bach K., Harnish R. M. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1979. 327 p.Bach, K. & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Downes W. The imperative and pragmatics // Journal of Linguistics. 1977. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 77–97.Downes, W. (1977). The imperative and pragmatics. In: Journal of Linguistics, 13 (1), 77–97.Chomsky N. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986. 102 p.Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Koopman H. The syntax of verbs: from verb-movement rules in the Kru Languages to universal grammar: Doctoral Thesis. Dordrecht, 1984. 242 p.Koopman, H. (1984). The syntax of verbs: from verb-movement rules in the Kru Languages to universal grammar: Doctoral Thesis. Dordrecht: Foris.Koster J. Dutch as an SOV language // Linguistic Analysis. 1975. Vol. 1. Iss. 2. P. 111–136.Koster, J. (1975). Dutch as an SOV language. In: Linguistic Analysis, 1 (2), 111–136.Flagg E. “You” can’t say that: restrictions on overt subjects in the English imperative // CLS 37: The main session. Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 1 / ed. M. Andronis, Ch. Ball, H. Elston, S. Neuvel. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 2001. P. 161–174.Flagg, E. (2001). “You” can’t say that: restrictions on overt subjects in the English imperative. In: Andronis, M., Ball, Ch., Elston, H. & Neuvel, S. (eds.). CLS 37: The main session. Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 1. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 161–174.Pollock J.-Y. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP // Linguistic Inquiry. 1989. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 365–424.Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. In: Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3), 365–424.Pollock J.-Y. Notes on clause structure // Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax / ed. L. Haegeman. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997. P. 237–279.Pollock, J.-Y. (1997). Notes on clause structure. In: Haegeman, L., ed. Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 237–279.Осипчук А. Е. Грамматические средства выражения семантики императивности в речевом жанре «приказание» // Научный диалог. 2020. № 1. С. 141–157. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-141-157.Osipchuk, A. E. (2020). Grammatical Means of Expressing the Semantics of Imperative in the Speech Genre “Command”. In: Nauchnyi dialog (Scientific Dialogue), 1, 141–157. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-141-157 (in Russ.).Kaufmann M. Interpreting imperatives. New York: Springer, 2012. 272 p. (Series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Vol. 88). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2269-9.Kaufmann, M. (2012). Interpreting imperatives. New York: Springer. (Series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Vol. 88). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2269-9.Schmerling S. How imperatives are special and how they aren’t // Papers from the Parasession on Nondeclaratives: Chicago Linguistic Society / ed. S. Robinson, T. Kevin, C. Robert. Chicago: Chicago Press, 1982. P. 202–218.Schmerling, S. (1982). How imperatives are special and how they aren’t. In: Robinson, S., Kevin, T. & Robert, C., eds. Papers from the Parasession on Nondeclaratives: Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Press, pp. 202–218.Эслами З. Р., Ларина Т. В., Пашмфоруш Р. Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world (Идентичность, вежливость и дискурсивные практики в меняющемся мире) // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2023. Т. 27. № 1. С. 7–38. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-34051.Eslami, Z. R., Larina, T. V. & Pashmforoosh, R. (2023). Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, 27 (1), 7–38. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-34051.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.